'F' in NFL draft rule signals failure

Search

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
FORT WAYNE, Ind. - Ohio State sophomore running back Maurice Clarett should be allowed to hop in his borrowed customized ride and cruise to the NFL next year.

If not yesterday.

The NFL's rule barring athletes from entering the draft until three years after their high school graduation is among the most archaic and unreasonable in all of sports. By any grading scale, the NFL gets an "F" in common sense.

It's a rule that contributes to the perpetration of questionable, if not fraudulent, "student-athletes."

Clarett is a talented football player who appears academically unmotivated. One former associate professor told The New York Times that Clarett walked out on a test after he looked at the questions and didn't know any of the answers. Hey, that happens. Sometimes, as a college student, you're distracted by jobs, relationships or the Dave Matthews Band. You meant to study. You didn't. You failed.

Except, of course, Clarett didn't fail. He was allowed to take an oral exam later and remained eligible for Ohio State football's championship run. Wasn't that convenient?

This flap escalated when it was reported Clarett received some nice gifts from prep-to-NBA legend and friend LeBron James.

It escalated further when Clarett reported some items were stolen from his car, which wasn't his car and, by the way, the customized TVs and electronic gizmos weren't his, either, and he exaggerated their value. Sorry.

All of those issues will be sorted out this fall by some combination of the court system, the NCAA infractions committee, Chris Fowler, Kirk Herbstreit and Lee Corso.

The core of the problem is this: Clarett is playing college football in order to play pro football. Yet, unlike his friend James, he can't skip the bogus pursuit of a degree and bolt to the pros anytime.

He has to wait until the spring of 2005. And that's unfair.

The NFL imposed the age restriction in cooperation with the players union, so there are two entities to blame. Members of the players union probably aren't too fond of the idea of more competition for limited job opportunities. Let the kids wait, they say. Most 18 or 19 year olds aren't physically ready for the NFL anyway.

It's assumed the NFL couldn't win a court challenge because a similar rule by the NBA was declared illegal by the Supreme Court in 1971. It's also assumed that the NFL would appeal the case long enough to prevent the player from winning until he was already eligible under the current rules.

A challenge to the NFL rule will come from a player who has nowhere else to turn, with an attorney willing to work for free (or less, given the necessary hours of preparation) and for free publicity. It'll be a player who becomes ineligible to compete in NCAA Division I-A and has the skills to be a potential pro.

Whether that rule-challenging player is Clarett remains to be seen. He's not participating in fall drills until the NCAA gives Ohio State an all-clear signal.

The real shame is, if Clarett is declared ineligible to play this fall and can't regain his eligibility in the spring, he still won't be allowed to enter the 2004 NFL Draft.

What are his options then?

Being James' bodyguard in Cleveland? Joining the Canadian Football League? Auditioning for "American Idol"?

If Clarett wants to pursue the NFL early, he should have the option. It doesn't take a college education to figure that one out.

http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/sports/6473116.htm
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
I think its an Ok rule myslef. It protects boys from getting killed by men.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,530
Tokens
I don't have a problem with it either. Especially wouldn't make an exception for Clarett. As a Big Ten fan this is really dissappointing to see Clarrett standing up Marcus Allen. I think this kid is just another one of those young punks with God given ability who thinks their sh!t don't stink.

KMAN
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
104
Tokens
One of the reasons for the rule is to keep college football competitive. The NFL doesn't have a farm system like baseball. College football is it. They need to keep it intact so they can evaluate the players, at least for 2 or 3 years.

Once again the problem here is with the NCAA. College players like Clarett yield millions of dollars for their universities and they should be allowed to accept, raise, earn money in any manner they wish. Also, one academic course should be enough to qualify for the team. Isn't there some kind of disinfectant that could rid us of the NCAA, the BCS and all those idiotic bowl committees?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,117,966
Messages
13,549,825
Members
100,549
Latest member
apptaixiuonl
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com